Tuesday 10 May 2016

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

Batman v Superman Fight Maxi Poster, Wood, Multi-Colour


 
Incredibly, it’s now been nearly sixteen years since X-Men began the incredible (and somewhat exhausting) avalanche of superhero films that continues to this day. Since then, we have seen all kinds of comic book characters make the jump to the big screen, from household names like Spider-Man and The Incredible Hulk, to relative obscurities like Ant-Man and the Guardians of the Galaxy. But while the Marvel Cinematic Universe has gone from strength to strength, DC Comics has had a tougher time establishing itself as a big-screen force; it had a major success with the popular Dark Knight trilogy, but what DC really wants is a cinematic universe to call its own. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is the first step towards achieving that goal, but does it stand up as a film in its own right? Let’s take a look!

After a quick run-through of Batman’s origin story (theatre, dark alley, mugger, gunshots, dead parents, well-full-of-bats, etc.) we jump forward in time to the city of Metropolis, where a helpless Bruce Wayne witnesses the destruction of a Wayne Enterprises building during Superman’s battle with General Zod from the end of Man of Steel. It’s an effective sequence that clearly establishes Batman’s issue with Superman, and we soon learn that Superman is to face a government investigation regarding his role in the destruction. Meanwhile, the villainous Lex Luthor has found some Kryptonite, and plans to use it as part of a twisted genetic experiment. Upon learning this, Batman steals the Kryptonite in order to destroy Superman once and for all, while Luthor manipulates Superman onto a collision course with the Caped Crusader.

As you can see, there’s a lot going on in this film, and I pity the poor overworked soul who had edit all of this together; not only does it need to establish a new Batman, it also aims to introduce us to the entire DC Universe, act as a sequel to Man of Steel, set up a future Justice League film, and provide a satisfying conflict between Batman and Superman. Whereas Marvel spent eight years slowly building towards a showdown between Iron Man and Captain America, Dawn of Justice has  to accomplish the same feat – and plenty of others - in just one film, and as a result the movie often feels jumbled and unfocused. There is an awkwardly place flash-forward scene in which a trench-coated Batman runs around shooting at people in a desert (?), as well as strange, shoehorned-in cameos from Aquaman and The Flash. At times it feels like the film is suffering an identity crisis, torn between being Batman v Superman or Dawn of Justice.

Happily, the last third of the film sees everything finally fall into place. Having spent the first two acts slowly (so very slowly) moving the pieces into place, the movie palpably shifts gears, cranking up the action while managing to tie all of the dangling plot threads together. This section of Dawn of Justice is truly a great spectacle, and redeems the film somewhat after the glacial pace of the early sections.

Pacing problems aside, where Batman v Superman really shines is in the performances. Ben Affleck as Bruce Wayne/Batman is superb; you really get the sense that has been worn-down by twenty years of crime fighting in the frankly hellish Gotham City. His Batman is a truly frightening creature, and the scene in which he is introduced is like something out of a horror film. So bitter and vicious is this version of the Dark Knight that you wonder whether Bruce really cares about fighting crime at all, or if hunting down criminals is simply a means for him to vent his bottomless well of rage. Superman gets slightly less attention, but comes across as a man who only sees in black and white trapped in a world of grey areas. He is genuinely trying to use his powers for good, but cannot see that the consequences of his actions can often be devastating. The star of the supporting cast has to be Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman, making the most of a small but effective role, while Amy Adams and Jeremy Irons give good performances as Lois Lane and Alfred Pennyworth, respectively. Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor sometimes becomes slightly grating, but you can tell that he is totally invested in the role.

As a film in its own right, Batman v Superman is less than the sum of its parts; a collection of interesting characters and ideas presented in a strange and incoherent narrative. However, as an introduction to the DC Universe the film is much more successful. Director Zack Snyder and his team establish a world that is distinct and different from the Marvel Universe, and create endless possibilities for sequels and spinoffs (the prospect of solo films for Batman and Wonder Woman is particularly exciting). The sometimes excessively dark tone might have to be toned down in future instalments (the moment when someone finally cracks a joke, a full two hours into the film, is quite jarring), but it is good that DC is trying to find a unique identity for its films as opposed to simply aping the Marvel approach, which must have been tempting. It is entirely possible that, once the DC Universe is fully established on the big screen, we will look back on Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice as the beginning of something truly special.



Ed McBain: Killer's Wedge (1959) and Money Money Money (2001)

  Thanks to the book exchange at my local train station (I owe them a lot of books), I recently discovered crime writer Ed McBain. Re...