Tuesday 4 October 2016

Dracula (1958)



Although Hammer Films had been in existence since 1934, it was not until the release of The Curse of Frankenstein in 1957 that the studio found its niche as the masters of horror. While the film was technically a remake of Universal’s Frankenstein (1931), it bore no resemblance to the earlier picture; Hammer’s Frankenstein was shot in vivid, sickly colour, and revelled in its violence and salaciousness so much that it made Universal’s film seem quaint by comparison. Buoyed by the success of Frankenstein – which featured Peter Cushing as Baron Frankenstein and Christopher Lee as the Creature – Hammer turned their attention to remaking another Universal horror film: Dracula.

The novel Dracula is a hefty, awkwardly structured tome that does not lend itself to cinematic adaptation, so scriptwriter Jimmy Sangster was handed the task of turning the book into a workable screenplay. Sangster streamlined the plot considerably, removing unnecessary characters and confining the action to a single, vaguely European town. The new story was lean and fast-paced: Jonathan Harker (John Van Eyssen) has travelled to Castle Dracula to destroy the infamous Count (Christopher Lee) once and for all. When he fails to return, his colleague – and master vampire hunter – Dr Van Helsing (Peter Cushing) sets out in search of his friend, only to discover that Harker has been turned into a vampire. After reluctantly killing Harker, Van Helsing learns that Dracula has set his sights on Harker’s fiancée Lucy (Carol Marsh) and her sister-in-law Mina (Melissa Stribling). Enlisting the help of Mina’s husband Arthur (Michael Gough), Van Helsing attempts to put an end to Dracula’s reign of terror.

A fascinating aspect of Dracula is the presentation of the Count compared with earlier versions. At this point, the role had already received two iconic portrayals: Max Shreck in Nosferatu (1922) and Bela Lugosi in the aforementioned Dracula (1931). Christopher Lee’s portrayal is very different from both, but no less iconic. When we first meet him he comes across as a perfect gentleman, greeting Harker to his castle and even carrying Harker’s luggage for him (what a charming host!). However, at the first sign of a threat, the real Dracula is revealed; a hissing, snarling, red-eyed monster. Interestingly, Van Helsing refers to Dracula as ‘it’ rather than ‘him’ throughout the film, and it’s entirely appropriate, as this Dracula is a wild, feral animal that has become dangerous and needs to be put down. It should be stressed that Lee’s performance is by no means one-dimensional; he somehow communicates to the audience that this terrible creature was once human, imbuing the character with a palpable sense of tragedy.

Despite the magnificence of Lee’s performance, his role in the film is actually fairly brief (an early example of ‘The Jaws Principle’ – keeping the monster off-screen to build suspense). The real star of the show is Peter Cushing as Van Helsing. The quietly intense Cushing was a remarkably gifted actor who was an asset to every film in which he starred, and his performance here is as good as any he ever gave.

But Dracula is about much more than the performances; the people behind the camera were also doing fantastic work. Along with Terence Fisher’s assured direction, we have Jack Asher’s striking cinematography and James Bernard’s thunderous score. Asher’s clever use of the colour red creates the illusion that the film is bloodier than it really is, while Bernard’s music lets you know, right from the start, that bad things are about to happen. Dracula has a great overall ‘look’ (which would become Hammer’s signature), and is a must-see for anyone interested in lighting, set design and shot composition.

Like all Hammer films, Dracula isn’t perfect; there are some misguided attempts at comic relief, and the film does drag slightly towards the end of the second act (although this makes it all the more thrilling when it suddenly speeds up again). As a whole, however, Dracula remains a shining example of filmmaking at its best; a team of masters of their respective crafts working together to produce a timeless motion picture.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Ed McBain: Killer's Wedge (1959) and Money Money Money (2001)

  Thanks to the book exchange at my local train station (I owe them a lot of books), I recently discovered crime writer Ed McBain. Re...